VC land a coup & A123 loses its CFO

Black Coral Capital, Flybridge Capital Partners, Stata Venture Partners landed a coup when they announced that A123 CFO Michael Rubino was going to join their venture backed firm Digital Lumens.

A123 – The consequence
This move may be a blow to A123 but a great opportunity for Digital Lumens. We wrote about ‘The Past, the now and the future of A123‘ earlier this year. With Michael Rubino leaving we feel that A123 has a lot to answer for. A123’s share price is down some 40% since IPO and the future path is somewhat in limbo. Losing a senior executive certainly adds to the uncertainty. Thus it is not surprising that Wunderlich Securities downgraded the stock. The new target price stands at $6! Now, for a company that was never profitable $6 may be considered good (remember those dot.com valuations?) but it certainly does reflect that the growth trajectory and EV/PHEV adoption curve is likely to be slower than anticipated. Arguably, we could see the stock trade lighter than current levels. However, at some point we would think that some large automotive players East (SAIC) or West (VW, Daimler – Smart) may have an interest in looking at the company.

The hard facts are bleak: A123 posted a loss of some $44m, with revenues at $26m. A turnaround seems still some quarters away.  A $6 share price doesn’t sound too bad when compared to our dot.com friends who may have had similiar costs but nowhere near as interesting revenues.

How does A123 business success relate to the EV sector? One of the interesting electric vehicles we have looked at is Th!nk, the Norwegian EV producer. (A HBR case study can be found here; paid content.) In May 2010, Think  presented an update on its business. It essentially announced that another $40m of equity was provided by the existing shareholder base. Moreover, the company projects that it will be cash-flow positive by 2011. A123, Enerdel (promo video) and Zebra will provide batteries ranging from 18 Kwh to 28 Kwh.

Think and Deutsche Bank provide a chart (see above) that summarized EV model releases over the next few years. So is A123 depending on the speed up model ramp up or are EV manufacturere depending on battery capacity? The interdependence is obvious and securing battery supply has long been a key battle ground.

Digital Lumens – Opportunity in the LED & SSL space
Digital Lumens operates in the energy efficiency segment which we consider is more attractive in the near term than betting on technology backed companies alone. Rather, the opportunity to replace existing stock with better materials seems obvious and makes both commercial and ‘green’ sense. LED lighting in particular appears to be attractive for its energy savings potential. The Department of Energy (DoE) has set up the Solid-State Lightening initiative (SSL) that proposes that it can cut US energy lighting usage by 25%. In March 2010, the DoE published a Muli-Year Program Plan for SSL. The report states that ‘[t]he global lighting fixtures market is expected to reach $94 billion by 2010, and SSL is expected to play a substantial role in the market by that time. Sales of high-brightness LEDs (HB–LEDs), the technology associated with LEDs for lighting applications, were $5.3 billion in 2009.” Siemens‘ Osram’s Sylvania program notably focuses on SSL.

Khosla Venture and General Catalyst have both been active in the LED space: both funded LumenZ, a Boston based University start-up. Checking on Khosla’s website, we fail to find it in their Portfolio section. However, in a presentation delivered in 2009, it is still in the portfolio. Highland Capital Partners made an investment in QD Vision. QD’s pitch is interesting ‘QD Vision is developing quantum dot solutions for efficiently backlighting mobile phones and other mobile displays, as well as LCDs for desktop and notebook computers and LCD television screens. These initial applications alone represent an addressable market exceeding $2 billion by 2014 for quantum dot-based components’. According to some news sources, QD Vision has raised a total of US$33m to date.

Overall, as costs of LED is coming down the adoption curve is likely to increase significantly. For now, technology hurdles, costs, and general consumer/ commercial acceptance are issues that need to be addressed.

Will Project Better Place really work?

Many people in the electric vehicle arena are very familiar with Project Better Place.  In short, the firm intends to circumvent the problems caused by the expensive batteries needed for EVs by employing a battery swap, or lease model, to charge users for their mileage rather than upfront capital costs of batteries. These next generation batteries can and do cost anywhere from 40-60% of the vehicle. Therefore eliminating the cost of the batteries can significantly enhance the economics associated with electric vehicles bringing many more models within financial reach of consumers in addition to solving the range anxiety issue of EVs.

Better Place has remarkably engineered a swap out system using robotics and advanced software. Most importantly, the swap can occur in about a minute, less than the time typically needed to fill a gas tank- see the demonstration here: Better Place Battery Swap
Better Place will also offer charge and ancillary services, but the focus is on the battery swap process.

My question is- what happens to the business model when batteries improve? For example, LiIon batteries currently cost in the $500-$800/kwH range but are expected to decrease about 30% within several years. One company, EEStor, claims to have a product in planning that is about $120/kwH and offers a 300 mile range. Better Place does have a working partnership with A123 Systems. (This emphasis on batteries is why investor interest and attention is given to such an important sector as discussed here.)

The company addresses this issue directly from their website: “The $1 billion per year being invested into lithium-ion battery research, with an increasing proportion going into automotive applications will lead to further advances in battery performance (including power, range, charge time, lifetime, and cost). While the industry has recognized lithium-ion to be the best battery chemistry solution for EVs right now, Better Place is ultimately chemistry-agnostic and willing to adopt new battery technologies as they emerge.”

Ok, but don’t consumers prefer to avoid a swapping process if possible? If cost is improved, why is there a need to lease rather than buy? If range is improved, what other technical hurdle is there that Better Place can help solve? To pose these questions, we need to assume that the billions of research being poured into battery technologies have a positive effect. While nothing is a certainty, the size, scope and diverse nature of firms participating in this technology race give the assumption support that battery technology will inevitably improve in cost, range and charge times. With this assumption in mind, what window of opportunity does Project Better Place have to capitalize on a temporary need? Is the firm destined for failure unless the business model is changed significantly? Project Better Place has an innovative idea that successfully solves several challenges today; the real question however is how management will evolve along with battery technologies in the future.

Your comments on this question are highly encouraged below.

Sources: Thomas Weisel Partners, LLC, “Race for the Electric Car” Report, March, 2009
Jacob Securities, Equity Research, Zenn Motor Company September, 2009

Tesla Motors rumored to IPO soon

The company that made electric vehicles cool again and dispelled the ugly golf cart stereotypes is rumored to file for an IPO very soon according to a recent Reuters report. What makes this CleanTech startup unique from say the recent A123 Systems IPO? Tesla is currently profitable! Profitability is one way to counter the IPO risks noted in this well blogged article about Goldman Sachs and their IPO business.

Tesla is on a mission to prove that Silicon Valley can do what Detroit, Tokyo and Frankfurt cannot. While some may think their Tesla Roadster (costs approx. $109k), which has a range of approximately 220 miles and Ferrari like performance, is a toy for the rich- a new Tesla Model S is in the works to dispel this theory and open the company to those with a smaller budget. The Model S will cost around $50,000, have 4 doors and appear similar to a nice Lexus, but more beautiful in my opinion. It also will not have any tailpipe emissions and will cost about $2 to power for 300 miles.

While Tesla’s automobiles are an evolutionary step as far as design, production and backing- they will nonetheless need to compete with companies like Nissan, GM, Fisker  and Ford who all have both government backing, and either an EV or Plug-in EV in the works. Along with several battery makers including A123 Systems, Ener1 and Johnson Controls, Tesla received $465MM in low cost loans from the US government to help spur development. It is interesting to ponder whether or not the market for efficient automobiles will prefer plug in electrics, pure electrics or if it is large and wealthy enough for both. Signs point to the latter as several of these planned or existing cars, including Tesla’s, have a lengthy customer waiting list.

Tesla’s investors include Google, founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, Daimler AG, Aabar Investments, Valor Equity Partners, Technology Partners, The Westly Group, Compass Venture Partners. Tesla has also received an ‘opportunistic’ US$82.5m equity investment from a group led by Fjord Capital Management, a private equity firm which focuses exclusively on clean energy. “Daimler, which invested US$50m in Tesla earlier in 2009, along with Aabar Investments, which is also Daimler’s largest shareholder, contributed to the offering to keep its stake at just under 10%. The new money was earmarked for Tesla’s expansion of its retail store network globally.”

The IPO would be the first from a US Automaker since Ford in 1956.

Electrification Coalition | News

The electrification report (Nov 2009) published by the Electrification Coalition is very detailed; needs a few hours to digest the details. It appears to attempt to give a brief history of the sector and highlights challenges and potential road blocks ahead. In some areas it serves as a Primer.

We see that Ray Lane of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Carlos Ghosn of Nissan Motors, Peter Corsell of GridPoint, Frederick Smith of FedEx and last but not least David Vieau of A123 are among the coalition members.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Electrification Coalition | News“, posted with vodpod

A123 Systems – Key negatives on the watchlist

Just read a research piece published by BoA/ML on A123 (Nov 3, 2009). They rightly observe that yes, the company could be $10bn revenue business by 2020. However, a lot of things may become larger impediments than anticipated today. None of the issues are material in isolation and can be addressed, particularly the management issue. However, I’d concur with the conclusions made by the authors that there is time to be a significant holder of equity at this point. In fact at a 6.7x P/S versus Ener1’s 2.6% P/S the stock better delivers on its promises!

Firstly, A123 is still fighting a patent litigation. At worst, a one-off payment or a 2% of Sales royalty could be the consequence. Near term it has been and may continue to be a distraction for management. Management itself could, apparently, do with more experience in the Automotive sector.

Secondly, Asian competitors are likely to have a larger resources pool. BoA/ML lists LG Chem, Panansonic/ Sanyo, NEC, GS Yuasa as key competitors.

Thirdly, battery costs must come down 33%-50% for electric vehicles to be competitive.

Fourthly, although some OEM deals have been signed it needs manufacturing contracts; the deal with Chrysler presents key-customer risk.

Interesting week for the battery sector

A123 Systems will IPO this week on Thursday on the US based NASDAQ market using the symbol AONE. The IPO has been widely anticipated as A123 often receives much of the attention within the battery start up sector. A123 has high profile backers such as GE and Kleiner Perkins. Already public firms such as Ener1 (HEV) and Valence Technology (VLNC) have seen their share prices run up, perhaps in anticipation of the IPO (up 14% and 34% respectively in past two weeks).

This week’s IPO will help put the spotlight on a variety of battery start ups as well as the entire sector as a whole. While some start ups are geared up with government funding and supplier contracts, others are still looking for footing. US Department of Energy loans are to be announced in the upcoming weeks and grants were already announced this past August to help jump start the industry.  On September 22, Fisker Automotive, a start up automotive company developing plug in hybrids and client of Ener1, was awarded an early DOE loan of $529MM.  As noted in an earlier post, the industry appears poised for a dynamic and exciting period of growth.

Sources:

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090922-703279.html

http://earth2tech.com/2009/07/20/13-battery-startups-hitting-the-road-with-lithium-ion/

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2236305920090922

DISCLOSURE: Author owns shares of Ener1