China the New OPEC for Rare Earth Elements?

If it is a daunting thought that the OPEC controls 40% of the world’s crude oil supply, think again. China has 95% of the world’s rare earth elements (REE) leading the late Deng Xiaoping to presciently remark that “the Middle East has oil, but China has rare earths.”

While oil gets a lot of attention, what does REE have in relevance to consumers? REE, which include 17 hard-to-pronounce names of chemical elements (e.g. praseodymium, yttrium, europium, dysprosium, erbium), are important ingredients in many high-tech devices and clean technologies. You need them in iPod, laptop, cell phones, TV, hybrid cars, batteries, wind farm facilities, military applications etc.

Until the mid-1980s, a single US mine was the world’s main source of REE. It was shut down due to environment concerns and low prices and China cornered the market. Outside of China, there are 3 big potential sources of REE – in California, Canada and Australia. The California mine has not produced since 1998, the Australian mine was due to start production in 2011 but has just lost its financing and the Canadian mine is aiming at 2011. Together their annual production could amount to one third of China’s.

It is no surprise then that Chinese companies have bought stakes in the Australian and Canadian projects but were so far unsuccessful in buying the Californian project. China’s State Council, or Cabinet, recently was considering tightening export restriction or even banning the export of certain elements and closing mines. While this will increase prices, secure supply for its own needs and create jobs for its own people, this will cause fear among foreign companies and governments as they may not have access to the metals and this will lure more foreign companies to the country to set up manufacturing plants there.

But foreign and Chinese industry sources doubt Beijing’s dominant goal is to create an Opec-like price cartel as China has flooded the world market with cheap REE for more than a decade. Now, Beijing needs to ensure that it has enough materials to grow its own advanced and clean technology industries, especially in Inner Mongolia where it contains 75% of China’s REE deposits.

However, foreign companies and governments know that if the supply is suddenly stopped, production outside of China will be stopped as well. While the Pentagon has raised alarm over the US military’s vulnerability in the event of an armed conflict with China, the US has been slow in focusing on securing the supply of REE as compared to its supply of oil. Meanwhile, the Japanese firms such as Sumitomo Corp and Toyota Motor Corp have begun developing alternative sources of REE in Kazakhstan and Vietnam. The Japanese has great incentives to explore new sources and diversify its supply risks because it imports over 90% of REE from China. It would be interesting to see how these countries’ resource strategies will work out in this new century.

Sources:
Will China Tighten ‘Rare Earth’ Grip?
China predicts rare earths shortage
Beijing may tighten grip on rare earths

FT: Which country has the greenest bail-out?

There is an interesting interactive graphics posted on FT (Mar 2009, updated Aug 2009) about the countries with greenest bail-outs. It reported that governments around the world have committed over $512bn of the global economic stimulus outlined so far to green projects, with 22% to be spent in 2009, HSBC estimates.

While we know that this is good for green businesses, there are proponents of a green stimulus who claim that there will be serious consequences if the money is misspent and countries could be committed to a path that has already led to a growth in greenhouse gas emissions. Interesting argument as we know some clean technologies can be capital-intensive such as solar and biofuels – it can take a lot of energy and materials to produce them.

I am somewhat unsure about the title “greenest bail-outs”. Is it really bail-outs or is it really green investments/stimulus package? The authors did not give explanation for the title.

By volume, the “greenest bail-outs” are:
1. China ($218bn)
2. US ($117.2bn)
3. South Korea ($59.9bn)
4. Japan ($36bn)
5. EU ($24.7bn)
6. Germany ($13.8bn)
7. Australia ($9.3bn)
8. France ($6.1bn)
9. UK ($3.7bn)
10. Canada ($2.8bn)
11. Italy ($1.3bn)

By percentage, the “greenest bail-outs” are:
1. South Korea (79%)
2. EU (64%)
3. China (34%)
4. Australia (21%)
5. France (18%)
6. Germany (13%)
7. US (12%)
8. UK (11%)
9. Canada (9%)
10. Japan (6%)
11. Italy (1%)
FT greenest bailout

Top PV Companies in the world

The following table is the top 10 photovoltaic device suppliers in 2008:

IC Insights 2008 Solar Ranking Table

Another research firm, iSuppli, ranked the top 20 global solar companies in Q1-2008 by production in 2007 and by announced production capacity 2010:

Top 20 PV_iSuppli
Top 10 Suppliers of PV Manufacturing Supplier in 2008 by VLSI Research:

VLSI PV Mfg Equipment Top 10 Suppliers

The following is summarized from IC Insights Research Bulletin 2009 report Solar Energy: Growth Oppor­tu­ni­ties for the Semi­con­duc­tor Industry:

1. Japan’s sup­pli­ers of solar PV cells and pan­els, which dom­i­nated the indus­try for many years, slipped in the sup­plier rank­ings in 2008.

2. Sharp was the No. 1 PV device sup­plier in 2006 and for sev­eral years before that but was overtaken by Q-Cells and Sun­tech Power Hold­ings in 2007. First Solar blew past both Sharp and Sun­tech, push­ing Sharp down to No. 4 in 2008 rankings, which are based on peak-megawatt value of the PV devices pro­duced and sold by each supplier.

3. Sharp was not the only Japan­ese sup­plier whose posi­tion declined in the 2008 rank­ing. Kyocera Corp. slipped from the No. 5 spot in 2007 to No. 6 in 2008. Sanyo, which was No. 7 in 2007, did not make top 10 in 2008. Mit­subishi also dropped in the ranking.

4. Future rank­ings are expected to show sig­nif­i­cant changes due to small incre­ments that sep­a­rate the top play­ers. The top 4 sup­pli­ers all achieved mar­ket­ share (based on MW sales) between 8.0% and 9.5%. A sec­ond tier of sup­pli­ers, formed by those ranked No. 5 to No. 10, have between 4% and 5% mar­ket­ share.

5. Other than First Solar, the ris­ers in the top 10 list were exclu­sively sup­pli­ers based in China or Tai­wan. Although Sun­tech slipped from No. 2 to No. 3, JA Solar Hold­ings rose from No. 10 to No. 7 in based on 109% growth in MW sales in 2008. Yingli Green Energy Hold­ing advanced from No. 9 to No. 8 on the strength of 93% growth.

6. In Tai­wan, Motech Indus­tries mov­ed from No. 6 to No. 5 thanks to a 67% increase in MW sales. But per­haps more impres­sive was the per­for­mance of Gin­tech Energy, which equaled First Solar’s growth of 144% in MW sales in 2008, pulling itself up from No. 12 to No. 8.

7. Gin­tech, like JA Solar, makes solar cells only; these 2 com­pa­nies fol­low the busi­ness model of top-ranked Q-Cells, which has only recently started to diver­sify beyond pure-play PV cell man­u­fac­tur­ing. Other sup­pli­ers are involved in panel man­u­fac­tur­ing, sys­tem instal­la­tions, and other aspects of the solar value chain.

8. No. 10 Solar World AG, a Ger­man com­pany that holds the dis­tinc­tion of being the biggest man­u­fac­turer of PV cells in the U.S., thanks to the recent expan­sion of its plant in Hills­boro, Ore­gon.

9. A U.S.-headquartered cell man­u­fac­turer, Sun­Power, almost made it into the top 10 in 2008, but Sun­Power man­u­fac­tures its cells in plants in the Philippines.

Comment: Chinese and Taiwanese rise up in the ranking as they are able to compete on cost, unlike Germany and Japan. I post here a map of PV manufacturer locations in China. Not sure how dated is the map but if you’re looking for JA Solar, you should look for “Jing Ao Solar” in the map:

Locations of Major PV Manufacturers China

First Solar Downturn?

In this Jan 2009 article, it mentioned that Palo Alto-based Ausra had laid off about 10 percent of its staff and planned to focus on being a technology and equipment supplier instead of independent power producer to begin immediately generating revenue.

The solar sector has seen widespread layoffs recently. Jiangsu-based PV manufacturer Suntech Power (NYSE: STP) confirmed it laid off 10 percent of its workforce, in part because it projected a decline in panel prices in 2009 of about 25 percent to 30 percent.

Hayward, Calif.-based OptiSolar laid off half its employees in Jan 2009 after it failed to raise a new round of funding. OptiSolar made headlines last year when it announced a deal with California utility Pacific Gas & Electric to build a $1 billion, 550MW thin-film solar plant. The company was seeking a loan from the US Department of Energy until it essentially ceased operations in Mar 2009 to find a buyer to take over operations.

Canada’s  Day4 Energy (TSX: DFE) announced layoffs for one-third of its staff, as it began to outsource production to Poland.

And in December 2008, solar cell equipment maker GT Solar announced plans to layoff 25 workers, or 8 percent off its staff, from its manufacturing plant in New Hampshire.

In Apr 2009, Switzerland’s Oerlikon Solar planned to layoff 60 employees and reduce the hours for 200 workers as it struggled with the economic slowdown. Oerlikon Solar reported 40% decline in orders and attributed it to problems with project financing.

OptiSolar isn’t the sole solar developer struggling during the economic downturn. In Mar 2009, Recurrent Energy nabbing the solar project assets of UPC Energy Group, estimated to be 350 MW. Fotowatio paid $20 million for the solar power assets of MMA Renewable Ventures. Solar-thermal developer eSolar raised $30 million in equity from ACME Group for a license to the technology and a 5 percent stake, a week after NRG Energy signed a $10 million deal to take an equity stake in eSolar and develop its 500 MW of solar projects.

According to EETimes, it said the reductions in government subsidies in Spain – a big market driver in 2008 – are a primary cause of the downturn in 2009. Spain accounted for a whopping 50% of worldwide PV installations in 2008 as installers tried to cash in on feed-in tariffs before a scheduled reduction in the subsidies. New and upgraded incentives for solar installations from nations including the US and Japan will not compensate for the Spanish pullback.

Comment: Is this the first solar downturn? With falling ASPs (average selling prices), excess inventory and funding freeze, will this be the first time the sun sets on the solar industry? Will the solar industry’s business cycles be similar to those highly cyclical semiconductory industry? While it seems to be, however, solar industry still depends mainly on large power infrastructures rather than retail consumers as in the semiconductor industry. This may provide more stability as world governments continue to focus on renewable energy policies to encourage alternative energy generation. See the case of China combating the solar downturn with subsidy here.